Culture, Media, ReligionA Dialectical Model of Religion and Media: A Three-Layered Psychotechnological Framework

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Alzahra University
10.22047/hsd.2026.567085.1121
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to explain the dialectical relationship between religion and media and to propose a psychotechnological model, thereby bridging the gap arising from the opposition between macro-structural theories (such as mediatization) and micro-agential approaches (such as the Religious Social Shaping of Technology), as well as the neglect of the psychological level and concrete mechanisms of interaction.
Method: Employing a structured theoretical synthesis within an interpretive paradigm and utilizing critical thematic analysis, this article integrates four major theoretical currents.
Findings:The key finding is the development of a three-layered psychotechnological model, in which the psychological system (comprising cognitive, emotional, motivational, and identity dimensions) acts as an essential interpretive filter between structural media logic and religious agency. This dialectical interaction manifests through three concrete mechanisms: religious shaping at the design level, theologization at the content level, and ritual-identity redefinition at the practice level. Each mechanism is elaborated with examples from an Islamic context (such as Qur'anic applications, serial productions, and virtual rituals).
Conclusion: The proposed model not only fills the identified theoretical gap but also provides a context-sensitive, applicable, and interdisciplinary framework for future research. It offers specific methodological implications for mixed-methods, cross-cultural comparative, and design-based studies in the field of digital religion.
Keywords

Ammerman, N. T. (2020). Rethinking religion: Toward a practice approach. Oxford University Press.
Brown, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
Bunt, G. R. (2018). Hashtag Islam: How cyber-Islamic environments are transforming religious authority. University of North Carolina Press.
Campbell, H. A. (2010). When religion meets new media. Routledge.
Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149
Cheong, P. H. (2017). Digital religion, social media and culture: Perspectives, practices and futures. Peter Lang.
Cheong, P. H. (2021). Authority and trust in digital religion. Bloomsbury Academic.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.
Doveling, K., Von Scheve, C., & Konijn, E. A. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge handbook of emotions and mass media. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Routledge.
Hjarvard, S. (2016). Mediatization and the changing authority of religion. Media, Culture & Society, 38(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715615412
Gunter, B. (2024). The psychology of binge-watching TV (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003390354
Grieve, G. P. (Ed.). (2022). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in digital media (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hasan Wahid, S. (2024). Exploring the intersection of Islam and digital technology: A bibliometric analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101085
Hoover, S. M. (2006). Religion in the media age. Routledge.
Hepp, A. (2020). Deep mediatization: Key ideas in media & cultural studies. Routledge.
Işık, T. (2024). The effects of digital culture and new media on religious identity in the postmodern age: The case of Türkiye. Medya ve Din Araştırmaları Dergisi, 253–280*. https://doi.org/10.47951/mediad.1524883
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
Lundby, K. (Ed.). (2018). Religion across media: From early antiquity to late modernity. Peter Lang.
Lynch, G. (2020). Religion, media and culture: A reader. Routledge.
Moll, Y. (2020). The spiral of digital Islam: Apps, algorithms, and the auditory. Princeton University Press.
Pargament, K. I. (2011). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. Guilford Press.
Pai, V., Kunal, K., & Kumar, N. (2024). Storytelling in the digital world: The power of narratives and analogies to demystify emerging technologies. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30 (11), 2610–2617. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i11.10733
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation Science, 7(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000194
Street, M. (2017). The media ecology: Understanding media as environment (New edition). Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers. (Understanding Media Ecology).
Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2017). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 619–632). Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, S. (2021). Digital Islamic practices: Everyday lives in the ummah. Palgrave Macmillan.
Scolari, C. A. (2012). Media ecology: Exploring the metaphor to expand the theory. Communication Theory, 22(2), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01404.x
Sumiala, J. (2022). Digital religion – A methodological approach. In H. A. Campbell & P. H. Cheong (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of digital religion (pp. C24.S1–C24.S12). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197549803.013.24
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2022). Data analysis in qualitative research: Theorizing with abductive analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Volume 7, Issue 13 - Serial Number 13
Humanities
Volume 7, Spring and Summer 2026, No. 13
October 2026
Pages 119-136

Supplementary File