<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>The Academy of Sciences of IR Iran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Development of humanities</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2676-5551</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Investigating the negative influence of technology on human creativity</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Investigating the negative influence of technology on human creativity</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>105</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>120</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">182456</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22047/hsd.2018.182456</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Behzad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bakhshipour</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Undoubtedly one of the terminology that is ultimately ambiguous is technology. The question of what is the nature of technology, it is one of the most complex questions that has involved the minds of scientists. We believe that technology is the It&#039;s human itself But the It&#039;s &quot;external appearance&quot;. The reason for this statement is that the origin of technology is in the creative dimension of imagination. Despite the confident relationship between technology and the dimension of creativity (maker and made), today technology is seen that is the most damage in the field of anthropology on the dimension of human creativity. In this research, we have tried to explain &quot; the negative impact of technology&quot; on the creative dimension. The method of this research is descriptive-analytic. In this research, we will examine in three areas of Ontological, epistemological, and Cognitive value the negative effect of technology</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Undoubtedly one of the terminology that is ultimately ambiguous is technology. The question of what is the nature of technology, it is one of the most complex questions that has involved the minds of scientists. We believe that technology is the It&#039;s human itself But the It&#039;s &quot;external appearance&quot;. The reason for this statement is that the origin of technology is in the creative dimension of imagination. Despite the confident relationship between technology and the dimension of creativity (maker and made), today technology is seen that is the most damage in the field of anthropology on the dimension of human creativity. In this research, we have tried to explain &quot; the negative impact of technology&quot; on the creative dimension. The method of this research is descriptive-analytic. In this research, we will examine in three areas of Ontological, epistemological, and Cognitive value the negative effect of technology</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">technology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">creativity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Imagination</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Anthropology</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://hsd.ias.ac.ir/article_182456_312411b9dc14be37364490382785fa73.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
